What is the difference between Attestation engagement and Direct reporting engagement in auditing?
Before we discuss the difference between attestation engagement and direct reporting engagement, lets understand what is assurance engagement at first place. Assurance engagement is simply an engagement conducted by a practitioner at the end of which he expresses his opinion on the measurement of subject matter against a criteria. This opinion will ultimately enhance the degree of […]
What are different types of audit reports or auditor’s reports?
The nature and type of reports issued by the practitioner depends on the type of assurance engagement. However we will be speaking strictly in context of audit engagement as the question is about the types audit reports. We can classify audit reports in number of ways but usually audit reports are classified n TWO broad […]
What is Detection risk?
According to International Auditing Standards detection risk is defined as follows: The risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements. In simple words detection risk is […]
What is Control risk?
Control risk has been defined under International Standards of Auditing (ISAs) as following: The risk that a misstatement that could occur in an assertion about a class of transaction, account balance or disclosure and that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements, will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on […]
What is the difference between Assurance and Attestation in auditing?
Putting it in few words then assurance engagement is much broader term and concept as compared to attestation engagement. It will not be wrong if we say that all attestation engagements are assurance engagements but not every assurance engagement is attestation engagement. Assurance engagement is an engagement undertaken by the practitioner (e.g. auditor, reviewer etc.) […]
What is the difference between Hot and Cold reviews in auditing?
According to ISQC 1 it is the objective of the firm to establish and maintain a system of quality control to provide it with reasonable assurance that: The firm and its personnel comply with professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and Reports issued by the firm or engagement partners are appropriate in the […]
What is the difference between Material effect and Pervasive effect in auditing?
The misstatements and their effects of great importance and auditor consider these effects for their implications on financial statements and auditor’s report. The auditor considers whether uncorrected and undetected misstatements have material and pervasive effect or just material but not pervasive while drafting auditor’s report. Although auditor considers these two characteristics of misstatements collectively to […]
What is the difference between Due Care and Due Diligence in auditing?
In IESBA Code of Ethics for Professional accountants, one of the fundamental principles is the principle of Professional competence and due care. Practitioner (auditor) is required to conduct assurance engagement with due care which ultimately requires auditor to act diligently. Due care simply refers to the degree of care which is expected from a reasonable […]